← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/35456/2015dismissed

Ashok Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2015-11-18Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-35456 of 2015 .....

Date of decision:18.11.2015 Ashok Kumar alias Sonu

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.266 dated 5.12.2013 registered for the offences under Sections 392, 395, 397, 120-B and 216-A IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Sadar, Dabwali, District Sirsa. Notice of motion has been given in this case. Mr. Anmol Malik, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance and contested this petition. Police record is also available.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.11.20 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-35456 of 2015 [2] and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that the FIR in the present case has been got registered in this case on the statement of Kishore Kumar. As per his statement, three persons on the motorcycle stopped the motorcycle of the complainant and snatched `12,13,750/- on the pistol point. As per the arguments, even the complainant has identified the present petitioner in the Court at the time of evidence.

Keeping in view the nature and gravity of the offence and the fact that if the bail is granted, there is every possibility that the accused may abscond and may tamper with the evidence, I do not find it a fit case where the present petitioner is entitled to the benefit of bail. Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

As the petitioner is in custody since 28.5.2014, therefore, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial by giving short adjournments and even day to day adjournments, if necessary. November 18, 2015.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.11.20 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh