← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36378/2016disposed of

Paramjit Singh v. State Of Punjab & ORS.

2016-10-07Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 118 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-36378 of 2016 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 07, 2016 Paramjit Singh ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENT . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . .

Jaspal Singh, J (Oral) 1.

Instant petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to initiate appropriate criminal proceedings against respondent No.5 as well as to take appropriate action on representation dated July 19, 2016 (Annexure P-1). 2.

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 4, at this stage. 3.

On the asking of the court, Mr. R.P.S. Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Copy of the petition be supplied to him during the course of the day. 4.

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though representation dated July 19, 2016 (Annexure P-1) was moved to ADCP-II, Ludhiana, but till date, no action has been taken by the authorities. Avin Kumar 2016.10.07 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No.M-36378 of 2016 [2] 5.

The instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to look into the grievance unfolded by the petition in representation dated July 19, 2016 (Annexure P-1) and if some substance is found, to take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

(Jaspal Singh) October 07, 2016 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No Avin Kumar 2016.10.07 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document