Pawan v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-36489 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36489 of 2018 Date of Decision: 28.08.2018 Pawan ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. A.K. Antil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. has been made for grant of regular bail to petitioner Pawan in a case arising from FIR No.38 dated 15.02.2018 registered under Sections 380, 457, 408 and 202 IPC at Police Station Civil Line, District Sonipat.

According to the prosecution, the petitioner in the intervening nights between 13.02.2018 & 15.02.2018 along with his co-accused committed bank dacoity to the tune of `57,75,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He is behind bars since 17.02.2018. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the grant of regular bail to the petitioner.

Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and perusing the RAVINDER SINGH 2018.08.30 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document paper-book, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner for the reason that a huge sum of `29,85,000/- was recovered from him.

-2CRM-M-36489 of 2018 Such a huge recovery of money cannot be planted falsely upon a person by the police by spending money from their own pocket. Since the petitioner has committed a very heinous crime, therefore, he does not deserve concession of regular bail.

Dismissed.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) August 28, 2018 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2018.08.30 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document