Honey Nagar v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-3656 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-3656 of 2018 Date of Decision: 17.5.2018 Honey Nagar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. K.S.Aulakh, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 0057 dated 19.12.2017, registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Women Bathinda, District Bathinda. Mediation has failed. Report has been received. Counsel for the petitioner refers to Annexure P-2. He states that pursuant to the order dated 29.1.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

State counsel affirms that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 29.1.2018 Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.05.18 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-3656 of 2018 -2granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 17, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.05.18 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh