Abdul Kalam v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 35701 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.2.2018 ...

Abdul Kalam ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

Manzoor Masih, complainant in person.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the case being called for the second time after pass over. Complainant Manzoor Masih has come present. He does not admit the compromise said to have taken place between the parties. It seems that petitioner is not interested in further pursuing the matter. The same stands dismissed for non-prosecution. ( H.S. Madaan ) 16.2.2018 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.02.16 17:52 I am the author of this document