Ritu Luther v. Vishal Verma

IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.224 TA-458-2025 Date of Decision: 26.11.2025 RITU LUTHER ....Applicant

Versus

VISHAL VERMA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

None for the applicant.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Even, on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of applicant. As per office noting, notice to respondent could not be issued, as process fee was not deposited.

Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the present application.

Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE 26.11.2025 Preeti S.

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No PREETI 2025.11.27 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document