Shanti Alias Shanti Devi And Others v. Krishna Devi And Others

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (140) Date of decision: - 27.05.2026 Shanti alias Shanti Devi and others ....Petitioners

Versus

Krishna Devi and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

**** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 22.12.2025, vide which the appeal filed by the respondent No.1 has been allowed by the Appellate Authority on the ground of personal necessity and the present petitioners-tenants were directed to vacate the premises.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, on instructions from his client, has submitted that the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to

-2vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. 3.

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the following observations/directions:- (i) The petitioners would be permitted to occupy the premises till 27.11.2026, subject to the conditions mentioned hereinafter and would vacate the premises and hand over the keys of the premises to respondent No.1 on or before 27.11.2026.

(ii) The petitioners would pay an amount of Rs.5,000/- per month from the month of June, 2026 up to the period the petitioners stay in occupation, on or before 10th of every month.

(iii) The petitioners would pay the arrears of rent @ Rs.2,250/- per month, if any, within a period of two months from today. (iv) The petitioners would file an undertaking on the said three aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court.

4.

It is made clear that in case the petitioners do not submit the said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the landlord to seek immediate possession of the premises in question from the petitioners by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt

-3of Courts Act.

5.

In view of what has been observed above, the present revision petition is disposed of.

( VIKAS BAHL ) May 27, 2026 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No