Rakesh Kumar v. State Of Punjab & ORS

CRM-M No.35769 of 2017 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.35769 of 2017 Date of decision:22.09.2017 Rakesh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been awarded the contract dated 21/22.08.2017 (Annexure P-1). He further submits that though the representation dated 11.09.2017 (Annexure P-3) has been addressed to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fazilka; Deputy Commissioner, Fazilka; D.S.P. City, Fazilka; S.H.O. Police Station City Fazilka and Inspector General of Police, Railway Police Force, District Patiala but he will be satisfied if direction is issued to respondent No.3 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka, only for taking appropriate action on the aforesaid representation within a stipulated period.

Without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, I direct respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka to consider the representation dated 11.09.2017 (Annexure P-3) Savita 2017.09.22 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M No.35769 of 2017 {2} served upon him by the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon in accordance with law within a period of four days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

The petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 22, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.09.22 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh