← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36632/2016allowed

Pawan Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2016-11-11Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-36632 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36632 of 2016 Date of decision :- 11.11.2016 Pawan Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Karandeep S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Manpreet Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No. 44 dated 10.09.2016, registered at Police Station G.R.P Pathankot, who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

Learned State counsel at the very outset submits that the complainant has given her affidavit that she does not want to proceed further with the case. It has further been informed that Section 10 of POCSO Act has bee inserted in place of Section 8 of POCSO Act. Keeping in view the above fact, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of the trial of the present case, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Pathankot. It is made clear that the bail granted to the petitioner shall also GAURAV ARORA 2016.11.16 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-36632 of 2016 -2contine in respect of Section 10 of POCSO Act, which has been added by the police, as informed by learned State counsel. 11.11.2016 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2016.11.16 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document