Gian Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-8933-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8933-2025 Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 Gian Devi

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide the petitioner with a rural service posting/transferring to a rural area within the districts of Gurugram and Panchkula, in accordance with the instructions issued by respondent no.1 on 14.08.2014, Annexure P-2.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 17.03.2025, Annexure P-5, in a specified period. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending representation, dated 17.03.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2-Director General, Higher Education, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks.

PAYAL 2025.04.09 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CWP-8933-2025 -25.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6.

Ordered accordingly.

7.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.04.09 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment