Sanjay v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-35976-2017 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-35976 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 11, 2017 Sanjay ......PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Prabhjeet S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. AG, Haryana.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.145 dated 09.07.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code(for short-IPC) and Sections 326 read with Section 34 IPC added later on, at Police Station Ateli, District Mahendergarh.
Heard.
Learned State counsel on instructions from EASI Ved Parkash submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation.
In view of submission of learned State counsel but without Sachin Mehta 2017.12.11 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35976-2017 -2expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 26.09.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;
(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 11, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.12.11 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH