Sonia v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35986-2017 Date of decision: 26.09.2017 Sonia
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:
Mr.L.S. Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7. In this regard she has also approached the authorities by way of representation dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representations dated 26.04.2016 and 25.07.2016 Annexures P-2 & P-3 respectively, in a time bound manner.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Abhaypal Singh Gill, learned Asstt. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition have been handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Heard.
Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is Satyawan 2017.09.27 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-36861-2016 -2disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representations dated 26.04.2016 and 25.07.2016 Annexures P-2 & P-3, respectively, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law and if required, necessary protection be given. 26.09.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.
Satyawan 2017.09.27 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh