Sonica v. State Of Punjab And Others
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-20729-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 30.8.2022 Sonica ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral) As per reply filed by respondent-State the investigating agency has found Rahul to have committed an offence and who is stated to be in possession of a pistol while others have been found to be innocent. Learned State counsel has however, informed that the report regarding the innocence of other persons has not been accepted by Deputy Commissioner of Police and the matter is still being inquired into. In view of the aforestated position, the matter is disposed of with a direction to the investigating agency to make effort for concluding investigation at the earliest and also to make genuine efforts for arresting the accused.
30.8.2022 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No MOHAN SINGH 2022.08.30 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document