Sunita Madhyasiya v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-37076 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-37076 of 2018 Date of Decision: 31.8.2018 Dr. Sunita Madhyasiya ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 77 dated 12.7.2018 registered at Police Station Women, District Rewari under Sections 313, 34, 506 IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 3 of SC/ST Act.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is in custody since 16.7.2018 and she is not named in the FIR and the allegations are that she had carried out illegal abortion. The counsel refers to the FIR and urges that the main allegations were against Ashok who had violated the minor. State counsel submits that CCTV camera was checked and the abortion was carried out in the clinic of the petitioner and no record was maintained.

The petitioner is in judicial custody. Police remand of the petitioner was not sought. No recovery is to be effected from her. The trial would take time.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the GURPREET SINGH 2018.08.31 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-37076 of 2018 -2petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 31, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.08.31 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh