Chander Shekhar & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ANR




    
    

 Date of decision: 19th December, 2015  Chander Shekhar Dharni and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. HPS Rahi, Advocate along with the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. Anish Setia, Advocate along with respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Complainant/respondent No.2 Ranji Gupta as well as accused/petitioner No.1 Chander Shekhar Dharni have come present. Complainant Rajni Gupta has made statement that she is not willing to enter into any compromise with the petitioners and whatever has been undertaken earlier is an outcome of undue influence, coercion and pressure.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.23 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

  Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his client has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition.

Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

#  !
$   %&%'(%)*"


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.23 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court