Rajanpreet Singh @ Rajan v. State Of Punjab
!"#
#$%&% ' ( (
((((( #"%"% '#)
((((( #&* '+#'"
, - (
. .
-
"
# $ % &&&&&
'
() *+, !
+- !
. -/- -+0 -1
)!
2!
.+
/30
#
,/,
"
4 $ "
"
#
()
# "
"
!"
"7"" #
8
# ""
()
)
2
#
!
8 # "
() *-0 !
+- 8
8
" 8" 8
"
"
!
!
0++1
!!
9!
# 8
8
() *-0 !
+- )
" !6 "
+++1
!
#
#
Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has produced the copy of the custody certificate, which is taken on record and he could not controvert the fact that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused in the instant FIR on the basis of disclosure statement made by the co-accused person.
Be that as it may, considering the fact that investigation is complete, "
!
.++1 "
#
"
+ " 8
:# 8" "
2
8
#
o
8
!
"
!
8
:"
8
"
!6
: ! !
!
"
2 )!
#
!"
2
8
6
!#
:
2
!
"
#$%&# '
'(%)%
!
"6
""
"
"
"
!
2
!
277/,17+
/ !01%'+#) .%'23 !0%!& $4 5&( ."!"#
6'1!78 "!
++-+- 8
8
"
2 )!
2
!
#
" #
#
#
;
"
!
"
!
"
8
"
!
"
8
!
"
!
)
!
!
"
2 9!"
3$
""
! '
8 !
<8
#!
6
"
:
9.
-:
( (
=
3 ! > 3* =
> 3*