Waseem Ahmed Alias Wasim v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-16925-2026 -1-
!" #$%$ &'
()*$+,
' -. /0 //
!" #
$
% &&& / ,1 .2'
%
'() * !+ , , -.-) / 0*!12 % , +++ %
% +34! '56 .6 -.--+ 7'( 7'8 ).6 )-) '-6 9.5 -.7 : -9 7898
;
!
-
34#+ % # % %
+ + + .- -.-- + # + # < % + # # % , #
" + +
CRM-M-16925-2026 -2-
< ,
% #
+ # < # +
+ + 4 ! " + % =:;
+
+ -9..><, + *
+ , + # %# %,
# " #, 4
7'( )-) 9.' 9.5 # 7'8 4 : -9 # + 4 + + #
% + + # # % # # .'
7- -.-9 4 + ? # ) 4 + % %
.9 +
# %@ % 4 % + % % 34! '69 .( -.--#+
% ,##
+ % @ % %# # % @
CRM-M-16925-2026 -3- -.
.- -.-5 :< , % % A% B
#@ %
%
#
, % # '7 # % @ 4 + %
# '
! = + = %
4 % %
%
+ + #% + # % # < , " " , ! % " % # % ++ @ % %
%
#
This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. 7.
The petitioner by forming membership of an unlawful assembly with the co-accused is alleged to have fired a shot with some country made pistol upon the complainant and the pallets of the same are alleged to have caused hurt to him. The allegations make out a prima facie case for commission of the subject offences as against the petitioner. Though no relevance can be given to the compromise which is alleged to have been
CRM-M-16925-2026 -4effected between the parties, however, he has been in custody since 04.12.2025. He is not required for further investigation as challan stands presented. There are no chances of conclusion of trial in near future. His continued detention is not going to serve any useful purpose. 4 #
#< %
< %
"
@ The object of jail is to secure the appearance of the accused during the trial and it can neither be punitive nor preventive and the deprivation of liberty has been considered as a punishment.
, + %" % : %
# +
# % %
%" + > % :>: A
+ >;+
( 4 % %
% @
% +
3/ 4
()*$+,