Sunita v. Bank Of Baroda And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9445-2026 Date of decision: 02.07.2026 SUNITA

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

BANK OF BARODA AND ANOTHER

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- None for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for the respondents. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter was called twice.

2.

Same was the position on the last date of hearing as well. 3.

Since learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present petition. 4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) 02.07.2026 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2026.07.03 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.