High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18444/2020dismissed

Narinder @ Sabi v. State Of Punjab

2020-09-11Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi1 pages

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18444 of 2020 Date of Decision : 11.09.2020 Narinder @ Sabi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Through video conferencing)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab.

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has already been arrested in an another case and with regard to the preset FIR, keeping in view the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C, Section 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act have also been added in the FIR and, therefore, the present petition is not maintainable, at this stage.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to file the bail application in respect of the present FIR alongwith added offences. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. September 11, 2020 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti/naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2020.09.11 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh