Prince v. State Of Punjab





 
   


      

!"#$ "%&'&#()** 






+ ,

   )- . * +
    

* ////   
    
 Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manoj Pundir, Advocate for the complainant.

   

0 *  .

  


  

    !"  #!$

$#%
 &  &     !"


 + '
 ()*
+,
)+)-. /

 &   0 1   #   23  4
,,  ',
+)
)+)- & &  #!

#5''*6)7')86'7,6*7/4 6 '+9/4   7     : ;#




 
   &  ! #5<=) /4

; #   #!   !                 !#   67    %     #  #   "   0 
             $#  ! !#
 ; # %  #! 0   #& 

&# " '+
+)
)+)-    !"  !

23  &   ',
+)
)+)- &!  ! &
; # #  #!  

&$&  

 !3&&(
 4
 &
>  / :?#$! !  0     #  
 $# +*
+*
)+)-
 3    ! $ &  0  
 3            

 !   ! # &  5# !  &( 53&&(
 @ 

   ! !   & #   <=)6)7/4

A 2.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case,





the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 25.03.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023)
5.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

6.

Other misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

   

  0*