Naresh Chhikara v. Sanjay Kumar And ANR

CRM-M-36233-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36233-2015 Date of Decision: December 18, 2015 Naresh Chhikara .....Petitioner

Versus

Sanjay Kumar and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.A.S.Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) None has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 despite service.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order, dated 20.10.2015, the petitioner did appear before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, and was admitted to ad-interim bail vide order, dated 28.10.2015. In support of his submissions the learned counsel has produced the MEENU 2015.12.23 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-36233-2015 -2certified copy of the order, dated 28.10.2015, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has also been supplied to the learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the State after going through the above order, dated 28.10.2015, has fairly conceded that the petitioner did appear before the Court below and was admitted to ad-interim bail.

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, interim directions, issued vide order, dated 20.10.2015, passed by this Court are made absolute.

The petitioner shall continue to appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless ordered otherwise.

December 18, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.23 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh