Sunil Somani v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-36253-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36253-2015 Date of Decision: December 18, 2015 Sunil Somani .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Dimple Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Avnish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Vinod Kumar, Police Station, Mujjessar, District Faridabad, are ad idem that in compliance of the order dated 20.10.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner did appear before the learned trial Court and was admitted to ad-interim bail vide order, dated 26.11.2015. In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of MEENU 2015.12.23 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-36253-2015 -2the case, interim directions issued vide order dated 20.10.2015 are made absolute.

The petitioner shall continue to appear before learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless ordered otherwise.

December 18, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.23 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh