Naveen @ Chhota v. State Of Haryana

2024:PHHC:049129

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (234) CRM-M-19785-2023 Date of Decision:- 10.04.2024 Naveen@Chhota.

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Vikas Gulia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 292 dated 29.07.2020, under Sections 120-B, 34, 342, (364-A, 379A removed later on) (Section 148, 149, 379-B, 323, 384, 201, 216 added later on) of IPC 1860 and Section 25 Arms Act added later on, registered at Police Station Matlauda, District Panipat (Annexure P-1). However, as per the custody certificate, the FIR is registered under Sections 120-B, 148, 149, 323, 34, 341, 342, 364-A, 379-B, 384, 387, 216 of IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial is not proceeding and most of the witnesses have turned hostile. However, learned State counsel has filed custody certificate, which is taken on record, according to which, there are 14 cases against the petitioner out of which 05 are under 302 of IPC.

3.

In light of the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court does not find any ground to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. (ALOK JAIN) April 10, 2024 JUDGE manju Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No Manju 2024.04.18 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document