← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/8670/2024dismissed

Harmanpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-09-03Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-8670-2024 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8670-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2024 Harmanpreet Singh ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:

Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate (joined through VC) and Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab Mr. Birinder Pal, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1.

In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for grant of benefit of compassionate appointment with the respondent-institution.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while passing order in CWP-17162-2016, decided on 02.05.2024 titled 'Sukhdev Singh vs. State of Punjab and others', wherein it has been held that respondent No.2-Institute is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 being a society and the said petition has already been dismissed. SATYAWAN 2024.09.06 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-8670-2024 (O&M) 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to differentiate the judgment in Sukhdev Singh's case (supra) to be applicable in the present case as the same relief is being sought in the present petition. 4.

Keeping in view the above, the present petition is dismissed in terms of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in Sukhdev Singh's case (supra). 03.09.2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SATYAWAN 2024.09.06 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document