Janak Arora v. Narinder Pal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.77-M of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08th January, 2020 Janak Arora ...Appellant

Versus

Narinder Pal

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr.Gurmail Singh Phull, Advocate, for Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr.Yogesh Vashista, Advocate for Mr.Ajaivir Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.

DAYA CHAUDHARY (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant has expired during pendency of the appeal. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the appellant, nothing survives in the present appeal and the same is hereby disposed of as having become infructuous. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 08.01.2020.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2020.01.10 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document