Ajay Pal v. Surasti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-4582-2002 (O&M) Date of decision :02.07.2026 AJAYPAL AND ANOTHER ... APPELLANTS

VERSUS

SMT. SURASTI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate and Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advocate for the appellants.

**** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

As per the office report, appellant Nos. 1 and 2 have been duly served, but none has put in appearance on their behalf. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have expired.

2.

In these circumstances, it appears that no one is interested in prosecuting the present appeal.

3.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellants to seek its revival by showing just and sufficient cause. 4.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

02.07.2026 (PARMOD GOYAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.03 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document