Indresh Raikhy v. The State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 36395 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 36395 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- February 23, 2018 Indresh Raikhy

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. J.S. Toor, Advocate for the complainant.

*** This application for pre arrest bail has been filed by petitioner Indresh Raikhy, an accused in F.I.R. No. 142 dated 11.8.2017 under Sections 406 and 420 IPC registered with Police station Sector 53, District Gurugram.

Notice of the petition was given to the State. State has appeared through Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, whereas complainant had put in appearance through counsel.

The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, however, it could not be settled there but the parties have settled it outside the Court. Learned counsel for the complainant states that he does not oppose the request of petitioner for grant of pre arrest bail. Learned State Parvinder Singh 2018.02.23 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 36395 of 2017 counsel also submits that in view of the compromise, he is not opposing the petition.

Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 27.9.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 23, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.02.23 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh