Rajinder Singh @ Rajinder v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36399-2015(O&M) Date of Decision : 03.11.2015 Rajinder Singh alias Rajinder .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI **** Present : Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** i. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ii. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

iii.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No.252 dated 13.05.2015, under sections 323, 307, 506, 148, 149 IPC, and Section 25/54/59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Assandh, Karnal.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that similarly situated co-accused Risala who is also not attributed any injury has been granted bail by order dated 21.09.2015 passed in CRM-M No. 31558 of 2015(Annexure P-6).

Learned counsel for the complainant and learned DAG have argued that as a matter of fact the allegation against the petitioner is that he took up a gun and handed over the same to accused Seo Ram and exhorted him to shoot.

Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case, I CRM-M-36399-2015(O&M) -2SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.11.04 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh

do not deem it appropriate to deny the concession of bail to the present petitioner.

Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Petition stands disposed of.

Since the main case has been decided, the Criminal Misc.Application, if any also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 03, 2015 sunita SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.11.04 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh