Anjali & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRM-M No. 36476 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 36476 of 2017(O&M) Date of decision : 27.9.2017 ...

Anjali and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Vishal Yadav,, Advocate. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) It is contended that petitioner No.1 - Anjali, aged more than 21 years has got married with petitioner No.2- Ankush, aged more than 24 years, against the wishes of her father, arrayed as private respondent No. 3, who is now threatening to interfere in their marital life, as such to seek protection in that regard, they have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 - Superintendent of Police, Karnal (Rural), District Karnal, Haryana, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and to take Banita Chugh 2017.09.27 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No. 36476 of 2017 -2necessary measures to ensure that lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of respondent No. 3 or persons claiming under him.

However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law. ( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 27.9.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.09.27 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh