← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/17237/2026allowed

Nikhil And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2026-05-04Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary3 pages

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH      

    



  !"

#$ 

 $" "#!% &     !"

#  

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY.

****         

      Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2.  AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.222 dated 18.04.2024, under sections 323, 341, 506, 34 of IPC (Section 452 IPC is deleted) (Corresponding Sections 115 (2), 126(2), 351(3) 3(5) of BNS & (Section 333 of BNS is deleted) registered at Police Station Sector-32-33 Karnal, District Karnal and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioners, on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-2).

2.

This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 01.04.2026, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements with regard to the compromise. 3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 28.04.2026 has been received from the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Karnal. A perusal of the

 

 said report reveals that statements of the concerned persons have been recorded in the present case, who have stated that the matter has been settled between them and they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. The compromise effected between them is genuine, without any undue influence and coercion. It is stated in the report that there are three accused; none of them has been declared as proclaimed offender/person; petitioner Nikhil is juvenile and one case bearing FIR No.152 of 2024 under Arms Act has been registered at P.S. Civil Lines against petitioner Lakshay, whereas other petitioners are not involved in any other FIR. 4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the case file.

5.

The Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, held that High Court has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of noncompoundable offence and quash the prosecution where the High Court is of the view that the same was required to prevent the abuse of the process of law or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This power of quashing is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.

6.

Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had observed that in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of Court, inherent power can be used by this Court to quash criminal proceedings in which a compromise has been effected. The relevant portion of para 57 of the said judgment reads thus:-

 

 "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. XXX---XXX"

7.

In view of the afore-referred judgments, perusing the report of the trial Court regarding amicable settlement between the petitioner and the complainant, this Court finds that quashing the FIR will accord a quietus to all disputes between the parties and it is in the interest of both sides to bury the hatchet and lead a peaceful life. Thus, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings and in order to secure the ends of justice, the criminal proceedings in the present case deserve to be quashed. 8.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.222 dated 18.04.2024, under sections 323, 341, 506, 34 of IPC (Section 452 IPC is deleted) (Corresponding Sections 115 (2), 126(2), 351(3) 3(5) of BNS & (Section 333 of BNS is deleted) registered at Police Station Sector-32-33 Karnal, District Karnal and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-2).   (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 04, 2026.

JUDGE