Rajesh And ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS




   

 



 

  
      !"#$ "%# &"''

("%)#* +"%#,#  " -. %/ ( $ "%# "#0 (1"()#*
. 23


 
. .




 Present : Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Vibha Dhiman, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Kuljit Singh Bal, Advocate for Ms. Gurjeet Kaur Sandhu, Advocate for the complainant.





   
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.82 dated 01.03.2012 registered under Sections 323, 406, 4984A and 506 IPC at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P42) arrived at between the parties. Report has been received from learned JMIC, Kaithal after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned JMIC has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned JMIC has also sent copy of the statements of parties.

RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.12 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


 

 



Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in




    

      



!

"#, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $





      

"

"

 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioners.

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

  



 

  

  

  

  
   
RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.12 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document