Ram Alias Ram Parshad And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125+257 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 RAM ALIAS RAM PARSHAD AND OTHERS ......Petitioners Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. S.K.Panwar, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. Sandeep Kumar Rawal, Advocate for Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, for respondent Nos.2 to 6.

MANISHA BATRA J. (Oral) CRM-15956-2026 1.

This is an application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for placing on record the certified copy of challan (Annexure P-3) 2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRM-M-17268-2026 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) for quashing of FIR No.609 dated 03.10.2018 registered under Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 452, 506 of Indian Penal Code 1860 (Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118, 333, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

-2Sanhita, 2023) Section 148, 149, 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 191(3), 190, 333 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) deleted and Section 34 of Indian Penal Code added) (Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) at Police Station Quilla, District Panipat along with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P-2).

2.

This Court vide order dated 01.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Panipat and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 21.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.609 dated 03.10.2018

-3registered under Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 452, 506 of Indian Penal Code 1860 (Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118, 333, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) Section 148, 149, 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 191(3), 190, 333 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) deleted and Section 34 of Indian Penal Code added) (Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) at Police Station Quilla, District Panipat along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. 26.05.2026 (MANISHA BATRA) P. Seth JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No