Vasima And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.




    
    

 Date of decision: 2nd March, 2016  Vasima and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

None for respondents No.4 to 6.

 !
"#  $ Report of the Mediator dated 29.02.2016 has been received whereby on account of absence of parties at the mediation, nothing could transpire. Even today, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners.

Learned State counsel has placed on record reply by way of affidavit of Ashish Chaudhary, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Headquarters, Nuh on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and on instructions from ASI Ajay Kumar, Police Station Nuh, District Mewat, submits that the petitioners have made statements before the police that threat to their life and personal liberty no more exists. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



     Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and nothing survives in the present petition, the same stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous. #  !
$   %&'("


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court