Sonia & ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh & ORS




    
        Date of decision: 10th December, 2015 Sonia and another  Petitioners

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh  Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate along with petitioner No.2.

Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Sullar, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh for the respondent.

 "
#$ !% Learned counsel representing the UT Chandigarh has placed on record report dated 30.11.2015 of Asstt. Superintendent of Police, South, UT Chandigarh with attested copies of the statements of both the petitioners duly counter0signed by the counsel for UT, submitting that there is no imminent threat to their life and personal liberty and they do not want protection.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.11 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court





  In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his client has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition.

Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

$  "
%   &'&()&*#  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.11 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court