Amandeep And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.




    
     

 Date of decision: 14th December, 2015  Amandeep and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Dhawaljeet Dutta, Advocate for Mr. Karan Choudhary, Advocate along with the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 4.

None for respondents No.5 and 6.



 #
$% "& It has been brought to the notice of this Court by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Kulwinder Singh, Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur that the petitioners have made statements that imminent threat to their life and personal liberty is no more there and which is vouched for by the petitioners, who are present in Court and have been identified by their counsel. Keeping in view that respondents No.5 and 6 have not put in appearance in spite of service, it appears that they are not RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.17 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   interested in pursuing the process of mediation and amicable settlement.

In view thereof, the petition stands disposed off. However, the police shall ensure that no untoward incident happens to the petitioners.

%  #
&   '(')*'+,$


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.17 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court