← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/9991/2020dismissed

Nitin Jain v. Director General Of Goods And Service Tax Intelligence Gurugram And ANR

2020-07-16Mr Justice Jaswant Singh,Mr. Justice Sant Parkash2 pages

CWP 9991/2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP 9991/2020 Date of decision:16.07.2020 Nitin Jain ..............Petitioner v.

Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence, Gurugram and others ..............Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Sant Parkash Present:- Mr.R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Gautam Dutt Advocate; Mr.Rajiv Malhotra,Advocate; and Mr.Satinder Boparai, Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh,J(Oral).

[The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual Court] Petitioner-Nitin Jain is stated to be proprietor of two firms namely M/s Shiv Trade Incorportion and M/s Om Trade InExim, who are facing proceedings under CGST Act,2017 for the alleged evasion of tax and have been also proceeded against for offences under Section 132(1)(a) (b) ( c) (d) read with 132 (1) (i) (ii). In the light of provisions of Section 69 of the CGST Act, the petitioner was arrested. His application seeking default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.PC has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 24.4.2020 (P2). Hence the challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 24.4.2020 (P-2) as also prayer for grant of bail in the light of RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI 2020.07.17 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP 9991/2020 law settled by various judgments passed by different High Courts. In our view the impugned order dated 24.4.2020 passed by JMFC, Gurugram is a revisable order under Section 397 Cr.PC whereas the other claims provide a separate cause of action, if any. At the time of hearing counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant petition so as to enable his client to file a fresh writ petition, if so advised, to seek his remedy in accordance with law.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that withdrawal of the present writ petition would not cause any hindrance in filing a fresh writ petition with better particulars showing proper cause of action. (Jaswant Singh) Judge 16.07.2020.

(Sant Parkash) joshi Judge Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI 2020.07.17 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document