← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36943/2017allowed

Raj Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2017-12-07Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-36943-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

(1) Crl. Misc. No.M-36943 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 07, 2017 Raj Kumar ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

(2) Crl. Misc. No.M-37003 of 2017 (O&M) Puneet Bansal ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Tejinder Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Both the aforementioned petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.345 dated 28.11.2015 registered for the offences punishable under Section 406 of Indian Penal Code and Section 409 IPC added later on, at Police Station City Sangrur. Heard.

Sachin Mehta 2017.12.07 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-36943-2017 -2Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ajay Singh submits that petitioners have joined the investigation, which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both these petitions are allowed. Order dated 04.10.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 07, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.12.07 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh