Rahul v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18885 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision:05.04.2021 Rahul ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Vishal Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.67 dated 04.05.2019 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 392, 397 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, 1959 (Sections 54 and 59 of Arms Act, 1959, have wrongly been mentioned in the petition) at Police Station Pillukhera, District Jind.
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition before the trial Court. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE April 05, 2021 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2021.04.06 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh