High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36969/2017allowed

Gurmej And ANR v. State Of Haryana

2017-10-06Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

CRM No.M-36969 of 2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-36969 of 2017 (O&M) Decided on: 06.10.2017 Gurmej Singh and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :

Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Naveen Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate for the complainant.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') in FIR No.159 dated 02.05.2017, for offence punishable under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 452, 506, 212 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') registered in Police Station Indri, District Karnal. Counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that he does not press the petition qua petitioner No.1 - Gurmej Singh. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed qua petitioner No.1 - Gurmej Singh being not pressed.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that with regard to petitioner No.2 - Parveen Kumar, there are no specific allegation of attributing injury to any of the injured persons. It is further submitted that petitioner No.2 is in judicial custody since 29.06.2017 and the case is still at the investigation stage and he is not required for any other Mohd. Yakub 2017.10.06 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-36969 of 2017 (O&M) investigation and no recovery is to be effected from him. Counsel for the State assisted by counsel for the complainant, on instructions from ASI Ved Pal, has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that 05 persons are yet to be arrested in the case. After hearing counsel for the parties, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner No.2 namely Parveen Kumar is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail, if the petitioner is found involved misusing the concession of bail, in any manner. (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 06.10.2017 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2017.10.06 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh