Taranjit Singh And ORS. v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 36982 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- November 09, 2017 Taranjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Advocate files vakalatnama for the complainant. The same is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation and submitted an affidavit that he does not hold any Passport. In this case no injury has been attributed to the petitioner. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Amarjit Singh from Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran. He states that the petitioner is not required for further investigation.

Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 04.10.2017 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE November 09, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.11.09 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh