Sukhwinder Singh @ Bittu & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

CRM-M-37087-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37087-2015 Date of Decision: January 6, 2016 Sukhwinder Singh @ Bittu and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.R.S.Randhawa, Addl.A.G.Punjab.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Raj Kumar, Police Station, Sohana, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) submits that in view of the compromise, so effected and the statements suffered by the aggrieved person, the Investigating Agency is proposing to submit the final/ untraced report after obtaining the necessary sanction from the competent authority. In view of the above, learned counsel for the MEENU 2016.01.07 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-37087-2015 -2petitioners does not press this petition at this stage. Ordered accordingly.

January 6, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.07 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh