Mohd. Hanif v. Rashidan @ Nasiran And Others

2024:PHHC:110835 RSA No.1464 of 2001 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CM No.8943-C-2022 in RSA No.1464 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.08.2024 MOHD. HANIF .....Appellant

Versus

RASHIDAN @ NASIRAN AND ORS.

.....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR.

Present:

Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for non-applicant/appellant. SUKHVINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) CM No.8943-C-2022 Prayer made in the application is for fixing actual date of hearing in the main case.

Learned counsel for non-applicant/appellant has rendered no objection, if the same is allowed.

Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the appeal is ordered to be taken up on board today itself.

RSA No.1464 of 2001 As per order dated 10.01.2023, it has been brought on record that appellant has expired and counsel for appellant was directed to move an appropriate application for impleading the LRs of deceased appellant. Learned counsel for appellant has stated that despite the best efforts none of the LRs of deceased appellant have come forward for pursuing with the present appeal.

Jyoti 2024.08.29 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:110835 RSA No.1464 of 2001 (O&M) As none of the LRs of deceased appellant are coming forward for pursuing the present appeal and keeping in view the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for appellant, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

However, the appeal may be revived again, if any such application is moved by the LRs of deceased appellant within a period of three months from the date of this order.

Pending application(s), if any, are also stands disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 28.08.2024 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Jyoti 2024.08.29 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document