← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37256/2014disposed of

Mahinder Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2015-01-27Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-37256 of 2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37256 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.01.2015 Mahinder Singh and others ....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. N.S. Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Daljeet Singh Virk, AAG, Punjab **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No. 84 dated 22.06.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/448/120-B IPC registered at P.S. Sahnewal, Distt Ludhiana, is being sought on the basis of compromise dated April, 2014 (Annexure P-2).

F.I.R has been registered on the statement of respondent No. 2 against the petitioners with the allegations that they had prepared and forged a sale deed of plot measuring 450 sq yards, situated in the area of colony namely Premier Complex, Ludhiana. The complainant is the cosharer of the above said plot and petitioner No. 1 is claiming himself to the owner in possession, who had since been expired. The matter has now been duly compromised between the parties, vide compromise deed April, 2014 (P-2) In compliance of order dated 04.11.2014, report of District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana has been received and statement of complainant-Jasbir Singh and statement of Surmukh Singh (witness of the present case) have been has been recorded. Jasbir Singh submitted GAURAV 2015.01.29 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document that he had compromised the matter with the accused persons and has

Crl. Misc. No. M-37256 of 2014 (O&M) -2no grudge against them. He has no objection, if the present F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. Separate statement of petitionersLakhbir Singh, Jaswant Singh and Ashok Kumar have been recorded to the same effect. The compromise has been entered voluntarily and without any pressure.

Consequently, in view of the status report and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429, the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation. Accordingly, FIR No. 84 dated 22.06.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/448/120-B IPC registered at P.S. Sahnewal, Distt Ludhiana, is quashed with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

27.01.2015 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE GAURAV 2015.01.29 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document