Dinesh v. State Of Haryana



 



    
  CRM-M -38082 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.02.2017 Dinesh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Mr. Ramesh Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Mahavir Singh.

**** Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral) By filing the present petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought anticipatory bail in FIR No.225 dated 21.09.2016, registered under Sections380 and 457 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Narwana, District Jind. On 24.10.2016, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel contends that alleged theft took place in Government Primary School. The alleged stolen articles were located within the school premises on the very next day. No complaint was moved by the Principal with regard to theft. However, the petitioner has performed love marriage against wishes of the Sarpanch. Therefore, the present FIR after delay of one month and 20 days has been lodged.

Sumit Kumar 2017.02.02 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document



 Notice of motion for 20.12.2016.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the petitioner by the Arresting Officer, he shall be released on interim bail subject to the following conditions:- 1.That he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

2.That he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and;

3.That he shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court. "

It is contended that in pursuance of the order dated 24.10.2016, the petitioner has joined the investigation The learned State counsel, on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation.

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 24.10.2016, is made absolute, subject to furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

The petition stands allowed.

   
  
     

  !"

 Sumit Kumar 2017.02.02 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document