Falak Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-26658-2021 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26658-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.9.2022 Falak Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Talwinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Mohinder Singh Joshi, Addl. AG., Punjab Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for quashing of GD No.45 dated 27.7.2020 under Sections 323, 148, 149 IPC in FIR No.116 dated 26.7.2020 registered under Sections 452, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC (Sections 307, 326, 325 IPC added later on) at Police Station City Jalalabad, District Fazilka on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

The above stated case was registered on the statement of the complainant/respondent No.2-Inderjit Singh against the petitioners. On notice of motion, respondents No.2 and 3 appeared in the Court through their counsel and pleaded that they have no objection if the FIR in this case is quashed on the basis of the aforesaid compromise which has been effected between the parties.

During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was directed to record the statements of the all the concerned parties with regard to genuineness and validity or otherwise of the aforesaid compromise.

PARITOSH KUMAR 2022.09.15 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment In compliance thereof, report from the Court of Sub Divisional

CRM-M-26658-2021 (O&M) -2Judicial Magistrate, Jalalabad (West) along with statements of the parties has been received, in which, it is mentioned that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners and for respondents No.2 and 3 are ad idem that in view of the settlement effected between the parties, the present petition deserves to be accepted. It has also come on record that the aforesaid compromise is genuine and the parties effected the same without any undue influence or coercion.

In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated further in the present case. Thus, continuation of the criminal proceedings between the parties would be a futile exercise and sheer wastage of time of the Court and thus, amount to abuse of process of law.

For the reasons aforestated and having regard to the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Five Judges Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, this petition is allowed and GD No.45 dated 27.7.2020 under Sections 323, 148, 149 IPC in FIR No. 116 dated 26.7.2020 registered under Sections 452, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC (Sections 307, 326, 325 IPC added later on) at Police Station City Jalalabad, District Fazilka and all the subsequent proceedings are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

( KARAMJIT SINGH ) JUDGE September 14, 2022 Paritosh Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No PARITOSH KUMAR 2022.09.15 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment