Salochana v. State Of Punjab & ORS
CRM-M-38296-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38296-2016 Date of Decision:- 25.10.2016 Salochana ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439(2) for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3, vide order dated 22.07.2016 (Annexure P-2), passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, in case FIR No.13 dated 16.05.2016, registered under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC at Police Station Women Cell, Ferozepur.
Perusal of order dated 22.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) shows that the interim bail granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3 was made absolute by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, keeping in view the fact that Istridhan articles have been recovered from them, though as per complainant, golden ornaments have not been recovered. Such articulated order, containing valid reasons, cannot legally Naresh Kumar 2016.10.26 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh be set aside in the garb of petition for cancellation of bail, unless and until
CRM-M-38296-2016 -2the same is totally illegal and without jurisdiction. The learned counsel did not point out any patent illegality or legal infirmity in the impugned order. In the light of aforesaid reasons, as there is no merit, therefore, the instant petition for cancellation of bail is hereby dismissed as such. October 25, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.10.26 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh