High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/38388/2018dismissed

Suraj Bhan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2018-11-02Lok Adalat Bench - 11 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-38388-2018 Date of decision: 02.11.2018 Suraj Bhan ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikramjit Singh, DAG, Haryana for respondents No. 1 to 5.

Mr. JP Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 6. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 7 to 9. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Service complete.

Separate Vakalatnamas filed on behalf of respondents No. 6 to 9, are taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate places. On instructions from HC Ombir, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that cancellation report has been prepared in the instant case and the same would be filed in Court, within a week from today.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to file protest petition against the cancellation report before the concerned Court. November 02, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.11.12 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether reportable Yes/No