Naresh Kumar v. State Of Punjab & ANR

Crl. Misc. No. M-3752 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-3752 of 2017 Date of Decision: 19.7.2018 Naresh Kumar alias Naresh Rawat ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. A.P.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab.

Ms. Arti Kataria, Advocate for Mr. D.S.Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 66 dated 11.11.2016, registered under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station Women Cell, District Amritsar. Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 6.2.2017, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that they have returned all the articles.

There is a dispute with respect to return of the gold items. The complainant can raise the dispute before the trial Court. Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.07.20 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-3752 of 2017 -2Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 6.2.2017 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE July 19, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.07.20 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh