Bhupinder Singh @ Jinda And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-453-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:109070

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-20453-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.08.2023 Bhupinder Singh @ Jinda and another

...Petitioners

VS State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present:- Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr.Mohit Thakur, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.Nitin Narula, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek


     

   

     

   

    



 ! "

 # 

$  %

   &  '

()  "



   *  +   "



# ,,  

',  %' - ".)   /!  0 

 0    

   

     1  $ !"# 

 , "



   %' - ".

) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom,   2



,3 , 

    %' - ".) 2.

Since quashing was sought on the basis of compromise, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.04.2023 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements in support of the compromise. A veracity report was also called for. 3.

Report dated 03.07.2023 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar, had been received. Report reveals that statements of complainant party i.e. respondent No.2 as also of accused/present petitioners herein, were duly recorded. It is opined that a compromise has been arrived at without any pressure, undue influence or coercion. The DHARAM VIR 2023.08.23 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.

CRM-M-453-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:109070 report is accompanied by the statements of parties. It is apparent that the complainant/respondent No.2 and accused/petitioners have arrived at a compromise voluntarily and without any coercion.

4.

Learned counsel for complainant/respondent No.2 states that he would have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question. 5.

This Court in appropriate cases can exercise the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal proceedings/FIR on the basis of compromise. A reference in this regard may be made to a decision dated 29.09.2021 of the Supreme Court in case titled "Ramgopal and anr. V. The State of Madhya Pradesh"1 and a Full Bench decision of this Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others V. State of Punjab and others"2 . 6.

In the premise it is an appropriate case for exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and to bring to an end the criminal proceedings initiated in the light of impugned FIR.

7.

Petition is thus allowed.     

   

     

   

    



 ! "

 # 

$ 

 "



   *  +   "

 # ,,  

',  %' -

".)   /!  0 

 0   and all proceedings emanating there from qua the petitioners stand quashed.

8.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ARUN MONGA) JUDGE 21.08.2023 'D'Vir Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No 1Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 DHARAM VIR 2023.08.23 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.