Rajeev Raheja And Others v. Mohinder Singh Utreja (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs

2024:PHHC:032917 CR-2476-2023 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (262-1) CR-2476-2023 (O&M) Date of decision:- 07.03.2024 Rajeev Raheja and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Mohinder Singh Utreja (since deceased) through his LRs and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the respondents.

...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

Instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia for setting aside impugned order dated 16.04.2023, Annexure P-9, passed by learned Sole Arbitrator, whereby, application, Annexure P-7, filed by the respondents for restoration of Arbitration claim, which already stood dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 07.02.3032, Annexure P-5, has been allowed, and the claim has been restored.

PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.03.07 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and and authenticity of this order/judgment.

2024:PHHC:032917 CR-2476-2023 (O&M) -22.

Upon instructions from the petitioners, counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties on 20.02.2024, before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, and on the basis of the settlement, an Award dated 20.02.2024, has been passed by the learned Arbitrator. He submits that the petition as well as Misc. Application has become infructuous. 3.

Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4.

Copy of the order be placed on the record of CR-277-2021. 5.

Counsel representing the respondents submits that CR-277-2021 will be withdrawn when it comes up for hearing. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 07.03.2024 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.03.07 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and and authenticity of this order/judgment.